What to think about Komen now…

Art of the Gala Oct 23 Austin

Funding is complicated, I’ll just start with that. And it shouldn’t surprise anyone that it’s political, especially for organizations at the level of Komen.

So goes the story about Komen’s decision to stop giving grants to 19 of Planned Parenthood’s 83 affiliates: It’s complicated.

(Wait, before I go further, let me just say I have supported both organizations, have friends at both organizations, and have benefited personally from both organizations.)

In a video defending Komen’s decision, Komen’s founder, Nancy Brinker, describes “new strategies” to ensure accountability, minimize duplicity, etc. As a donor, this is what we demand nonprofits and foundations do, right? Make sure my money’s being used in the most effective and efficient way — and that it’s not given to suspicious nonprofits — right?!

A New York Times story states that “the Komen board voted that all of its vendors and grantees must certify that they are not under investigation by federal, state or local authorities.” Folks, this sounds reasonable.

The story also states that the board knew the only grantee this would affect would be Planned Parenthood. And they did it anyway. Beyond that, the story states that they did it purposefully, because it would affect Planned Parenthood specifically. Hmmm…..

Okay, it sounds like Komen bowed to pro-life pressure. But if I were working on this story, I would dig a little deeper into the relationship between the two organizations, as funder and grantee: Exactly how does the funding work? What are the other requirements for grantees? How much warning did the Planned Parenthood affiliates get from Komen? Why only those 19 affiliates? What might partner nonprofits do to help make up for this loss of funding? Why was it assumed that these affiliates would continue to get funding indefinitely anyway? How might this affect Planned Parenting’s funding going forward (because reactionary, outraged donations don’t last, let’s face it)? How might it affect Komen’s?

The journalist in me sees easy bait for website traffic. (“Komen Ends Mammograms for Poor Women”) But the nonprofit communications professional in me sees how this decision can be more complicated than it looks — and maybe even more defensible for Komen. (I would hate to be a communications director at a Komen affiliate right now. Oy.)

And on a personal level, it’s very hard for me to turn this into a witch hunt because I believe Komen’s mission is so important. And because I know of so many people who work for and raise money for Komen. I mean, we all do.

Komen is huge. It’s one of the few nonprofit “brands” that everyone can name. At some point, its politics and fundraising “secrets” had to come out. We shouldn’t act so shocked and appalled.

Moreover … we can’t let this divide us, ladies. This is just what they want! (And by “they” I mean the forces that try to keep women in their place. You know who you are.) Let’s not settle this the easy way, high school way — with ugly Facebook comments and Twitter accusations, FFS. Let’s figure this out.

Either way, aren’t you excited about the progress this is going to lead to? We just got the Obama administration to tell employers and health insurance providers that they must cover contraception for women free of charge, despite political pressure to rule otherwise. Stay positive, ladies!



Art of the Gala Oct 23 Austin
About givingcityaustin 794 Articles
GivingCity is Austin's only cause-focused media company helping people and organizations understand our community and inspiring them to make it better. Online, in print, broadcast and live. Learn more.

3 Comments on What to think about Komen now…

  1. Great perspective, Monica! This is spot on. It certainly is complicated. And we aren’t privy to all the facts that led to this decision. However, as a fellow nonprofit communications professional, it’s Komen’s communications strategy following the decision that really bothers me. Not the decision itself. Nothing against Komen at all, I just wish they were handling the fallout better.

  2. I think that it is totally contradictory for Komen to support Planned Parenthood when there is an established link between breast cancer ( precisely what Komen alleges to be battling against) and abortion (Planned Parenthood provides abortions) Therefore, planned parenthood services put women at risk for breast cancer… the same cancer Komen alleges to be trying to eradicate…. get it? http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/The_Link.htm
    And in addition as far as contraceptives being a MUST for companies to provide to employees, this is anything but good news for religious FREEDOM, which this country was founded on and which protected up until the Obama administration. Forcing institutions ,that are morally opposed to contraception, is in fact not progress at all.
    And at this moment you may be celebrating because this infringement of rights aligns with your personal philosophy, but try to imagine the ramifications of limiting religious freedoms. http://diopitt.org/hhs-delays-rule-contraceptive-coverage
    ExPlORE the issues for yourself and get a balanced view before you wholeheartedly swallow what the liberal media and this website are feeding you!

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Stop Giving to the Susan G. Komen Foundation! - Pilant's Business Ethics | Pilant's Business Ethics

Comments are closed.